![]() The lexical hypothesis is discussed in detail by Saucier and Goldberg (1996, 2001), but its simplest form, first expressed by Klages (1926/1932), is that human attributes that are important to people in a society will become part of that society’s language. The universality of these concepts across such disparate, independently derived origins might indicate that these personality differences are intrinsic to all humans and so universally relevant that human beings in all types of societies notice them. Suppose there are some personality-trait concepts that are used by members of every society in the world, no matter how isolated. ![]() The nine ubiquitous personality concepts include some not previously identified and suggest a core of possibly universal concepts. ![]() The cluster-classification method uncovered nine ubiquitous personality concepts, plus six that were present in at least 12 of the 13 languages. English-language definitions of dictionary entries from the 13 languages were matched to the meanings of the synonym clusters. This study used clusters of empirically related terms (e.g., brave, courageous, daring), based on a taxonomy of English-language personality concepts that consisted of 100 personality-trait clusters. The goal of our exploratory research was to discover ubiquitous personality concepts in these 13 independent societies and their languages, providing a window into personality concepts across a broad range of cultures and languages. These 13 societies are highly diverse in geographical location, culture, and language family their languages developed in isolation from modern-world languages. ![]() To investigate the generalizability of personality concepts, we examined the English translations of individual-difference entries from the dictionaries of 12 small-scale societies previously studied for ubiquity of individual differences, plus the dictionary of an additional society not previously studied in this manner. Anything but “taking it.There is longstanding interest in the generalizability of personality across diverse cultures. If you cannot stay away from things that trigger the abuse. It is like boasting about your ability to take punches in the face. They succumb to the trickery and stick around for more. They say things like “Come on, can’t you take a joke,” or “I thought we were friends, and friends tolerate each other.” No, I am sorry, I cannot take a joke, and no I do not want to tolerate you neither do I want you as a friend. I have seen abused people boast about their ability to withstand abuse: “It does not bother me.” or “I have a thick skin,” are all signs that one might be too tolerant to an abuser.Įven abusers encourage their victims to have a thick skin and not run. Actually abusers thrive because of people who think they “can handle it.” While they cannot continue their favorite sport of abusing others if others have a shorter fuse. While in 99% of situations, these are good traits to have, however not when being abused. When one is verbally or mentally abused, his worst enemies are tolerance, bravery, and patience. There is no valor in getting devoured by an abuser. The morale of the story is: It is better to run than to get eaten. When a lion stalks a herd, it is the one that does not run that gets targeted first.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |